Sphere Links

I’ve implemented a little update for the ‘Related Content’ that’s found at the bottom of each post. While all posts will continue to link to other posts on a vaguely similar theme, longer posts will show a ‘Sphere It!’ link.

These links show content from all around the web and particularly the ‘blogosphere’ as bloggers like to call it. I think of the ‘blogosphere’ just as I would ‘the media’ but with the simple difference that content is written by normal people and perhaps not a professional production. The Sphere link opens an onscreen box which links to this other aggregated content. Just as the ‘Related Posts’ links are generated automatically and without any input from me (in their case, by Yahoo), Sphere content is linked via the company itself and I have no control over what it shows your or how or why.

Other examples of Sphere links can be seen below:
Walt Mossberg
TechCrunch

Popularity: 1% [?]

Response to Surface: They Fuck It Up

The ‘best’ reaction to the Surface computer I posted about yesterday comes from ‘The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs’ which comes out with the winning headline: Microsoft: Now We Will Fuck Up Your Coffee Table

These friggin guys just don’t quit, do they? They’ve ruined computing. …Now they’re going after household furniture too with this “Surface” computer. Just think. Soon you can sit down and start cursing at your coffee table when it freezes up or needs to reboot or warns you about some security alert. Jesus.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Twitter, the opposite of GTD

I’ve finally come across someone who at least questions one of the emergent Web 2.0 phenomenons. Lifehacker writes the first post I’ve read which criticizes the new fad-of-the-moment Twitter for the timewaster that it is. I don’t see much point in posting micro-posts about what I’m doing at any given moment. If I wanted to do that I’d have an always-on connection to MSN or AIM through my mobile: I don’t see a need for another blogging application. One’s enough for the moment.

Senor writer Elinor Mills says Twitter’s just a bunch of “stream-of-conscious babblings” for friends and people who have time to “read inane musings of strangers.” Staff writer Caroline McCarthy says Twitter’s randomness is a “welcome diversion.” Coincidentally, the Lifehacker editors had quite the internal debate about whether or not Twitter is a post-worthy app, and while there was a difference of opinion about Twitter’s longevity, we all agreed it is never going to boost productivity.

Lifehacker: Is Twitter Worth Your Time?

Popularity: 1% [?]

The Potential of the Young

Following on from ‘Microsoft is Dead‘, I’ve just read another long essay in which Paul Graham, a computer programmer, author and venture capitalist, muses on the potential of the young, how large (technology – in his concept) companies should really be buying small startups instead of trying to hire all the good people direcly as well as the quandry of whether to stay in school or start your own business. Graham’s basic thought is that ‘the youth of today’ have immense power because we can take all the risks in the world and largely, come out unscathed from them. We can create our own companies and see how they almost value themselves within the marketplace rather than having to rely on a corporate master for a dollarEuro value on a paycheck. He acknowledges the risk that people take when considering leaving college, grad school or business school but also counsels that it may be the best decision one can make. It’s all a question of timing and of your own and your colleagues’ personal skill.

Here are some quotes, which I’ve shuffled around in order and context to make work here. The essay is worth reading in full. The link is below.

Most organizations who hire people right out of college are only aware of the average value of 22 year olds, which is not that high….The most productive young people will always be undervalued by large organizations, because the young have no performance to measure yet, and any error in guessing their ability will tend toward the mean…. I think few realize the huge spread in the value of 20 year olds. Some, it’s true, are not very capable. But others are more capable than all but a handful of 30 year olds.

Most undergrads probably have more debts than assets. They may feel they have nothing to invest. But that’s not true: they have their time to invest, and the same rule about risk applies there. Your early twenties are exactly the time to take insane career risks… Riskier career moves pay better on average, because there is less demand for them. Extreme choices like starting a startup are so frightening that most people won’t even try.

What’s an especially productive 22 year old to do? One thing you can do is go over the heads of organizations, directly to the users. Any company that hires you is, economically, acting as a proxy for the customer. The rate at which they value you (though they may not consciously realize it) is an attempt to guess your value to the user. If you want, you can opt to be valued directly by users, by starting your own company.

The market is a lot more discerning than any employer. And it is completely non-discriminatory. On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog. And more to the point, nobody knows you’re 22. All users care about is whether your site or software gives them what they want. If you’re really productive, why not make employers pay market rate for you? Why go work as an ordinary employee for a big company, when you could start a startup and make them buy it to get you?

-from Hiring is Obsolete by Paul Graham

Popularity: 1% [?]