Happy (Hippy?) G8 Protestor with a marvelous riot shield backdrop…



Now you know who’s watching the watchers, taken by davefitch and posted on Flickr.

A couple of hours ago, on initially seeing this image, I was startled into thinking I thought I’ve been even more out of the news that I have in fact been, managing to miss an entire G8 summit. This stunning photograph, an addition to the photostream of a new Flickr contact had me jumping onto Google News to see what the Group of Eight had been up to recently, only to dig deeper and find that the demonstration shown here took place in July 2005. Phew. This particularly resonated with me because I found out today that over the past week I’d missed the whole news about a number of British Navy Seamen being held captive by Iranian force in the Gulf. News of ‘aveux contraints’, ‘political sacrifices’, ‘la patience et la détermination’, les ‘bras de fer’ et ‘les libérations dès que possible’ all around, and me in center of European international cooperation, oblivious. Oops. Clearly I’ve been reading the wrong news. Less Sopranos, tvs and more international politics I think.

Popularity: 1% [?]

The entire Sopranos storyline in just 7 Minutes

Who has the time for all those seasons. No matter how good it is. If you miss the beginning, there’s no chance of catching up! This should help. Plus, it’s hilarious, which is always good. I love the deadpan voiceover with the clips. Someone did a bloody good job on this. I can’t imagine having to go through a boatload of episodes to find hundreds of half second clips that show the whole timeline of the show. This had better not get pulled for copyright infringement. I’d say it’s the perfect example of a fair use. Well maybe not perfect example but it’s a good video anyway!
via Defamer: Short Ends: Seven Minutes In The YouTubes With Tony

Popularity: 3% [?]

429 Life’s Gay Little Secret

About a year ago I posted about a little clothing brand called ’429 Life’ whose name comes from the use of a phone’s keypad to spell out the word ‘gay’. You can read it at: 4-2-9 spells G-A-Y. I was pretty keen on them at the time, I think the idea’s pretty cool. It’s one of those ‘in the know’ kind of ideas. You either get it or you don’t. Perhaps the ‘in joke’ was just a little to ‘in’ for some people, including the company itself. In my post last year I wrote:

The t-shirts tastefully, in tiny writing, have slogans like ‘Are You 429′, ‘429 You Wish’, ‘429 Boy’, and ‘Absolutely 429′. If you’re unsure whether you’re 429 or not, you can buy the ‘premium soft cotton’ t-shirts without any label.

They don’t talk about the gay thing anymore. Now, under the ‘We Are 429′ section of their website they state, in ‘understated’ lowercase:

we like to challenge the idea of ‘labels’. so, when asked what 429 means, we can only give one answer: 429 is being confident in your own skin…
work in them, play in them, date in them … do whatever you want in them (we don’t judge).

I hate this lack of any attitude. It makes me want to despise their clothes, which isn’t as tough as it was before because they now look pretty ordinary. There’s nothing special about them. Of course they’re nice ‘premium’ shirts and such, but while last year their clothes were something remarkable, now they’re nothing more than what you could pick up at Zara with half of the price and none of the gay-shame. But they haven’t developed enough shame to stop putting homoerotic photos of muscly boys, as below, in their catalogue. Cute boys are apparently still allowed: it’s honesty and frankness that aren’t permitted. Theirs new style is like Abercrombie and Fitch but while A&F doesn’t really pretend to be anything but pretty and butch, 429 actively tries to deny its gay roots. Gross.

429 Life pretending to be straight

429 Life

Popularity: 6% [?]

What Some People Think

Last night on 60 Minutes, Katie Couric kept referring to “Some people.” She said that “some” were saying the Edwardses were courageous, and “others” were saying they were callous and ambitious. I kept waiting for John or Elizabeth Edwards to ask her who “some people” were exactly, but they didn’t. …Couric quoted John Edwards’ remark earlier in the week – that he was in the race “for the duration,” and asked him, “How can you say that, Senator Edwards, with such certainty? If, God forbid, Elizabeth doesn’t respond to whatever treatment is recommended, if her health deteriorates, would you really say that?” Thank you, Katie, for asking that question. The world could not have survived had you not asked it. Of course, “Some people” were undoubtedly thinking it. And it would have been a tragedy not to have given voice to that thought, wouldn’t it? Or would it? -Nora Ephron@HuffPost

Popularity: 1% [?]