Wal-Mart crying wolf: attempts to dominate UK retailing by ‘investigation’

The American owner of the UK supermarket chain Asda has complained to the Government about the strength of competition within the retail sector:

US-based Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, told the Sunday Times that such a probe was vital now that Tesco’s UK market share had hit a record 30.5%.

Tesco, the UK’s largest supermarket group to Asda’s number two [at around 17%], said the 30.5% figure was “misleading” [because it didn't include food sales from traditionally non-food retailers such as Marks & Spencer and Department stores.]

I am sure there is a point where government is compelled to intervene, particular in the UK, where… planning laws that make it difficult to compete,” said Mr Scott.

BBC News: Wal-Mart calls for Tesco inquiry

The inability of a big-box retailer to adjust to the intricacies of the UK market doesn’t warrant a government enquiry. While Tesco could be complained about for getting too big, getting too powerful in its relationships with farmers and suppliers, it can’t be held accountable for making it hard for rivals to ‘catch up’. Wal-Mart isn’t known for its farmer, consumer or employee friendly policies so just because they feel a grudge towards competitors who they admit do better over the summer months than they do (because of competitor’s higher quality fresh fruits and vegetables which are popular over the summer), doesn’t mean that they should be able to launch into attacks on others. For Asda to compete they will have to move out of low quality, poor value, unhealthy foods; big cuddly toys; discount clothes; and move towards a better style of produce as retailers such as Marks & Spencer have. The race to the bottom is a quick drop and smaller corner shop stores do bad quality far more readily and easily than Asda ever will.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Patricia: Dreaming of Peter Jennings

[On the night of the 2000 Presidential election] I stayed up till 1 a.m. or so and then decided that my sleeplessness wasn’t going to ensure that the damn state stayed blue so I closed my eyes and fell asleep.
Hard habits, however, are hard to break so I left the TV on. Somewhere around 3 a.m. I think I woke up and with blurry eyes saw Peter Jennings talking to George Stephanopoulos and some other guy. I woke up enough to see if any decision had been reached. When I realized that it was still too close to call, I closed my eyes and dropped my head to the pillow. Seconds later I heard Peter Jennings say something like, “You two keep talking while I go over here and put out this fire.”

the last5 pages.com

Popularity: 1% [?]

Arizona Paper drops ‘shrill and mean-spirited’ Ann Coulter

After a spate of bad press and widespread negative reactions to her gaffs and very public errors (Canada sending troops to Vietnam?!), the Arizona Daily Star has dropped the syndicated column of Ann Coulter.
David Stoeffler, the newly appointed editor of the Star following the paper’s aquisition by Lee Enterprises in early June, had asked for guidance from readers of the paper in getting to know his new neighborhood rather than setting about making changes blindly:

So help me get acquainted with my new home. What do I need to know about Tucson? What do you see as the role of the newspaper in the community? Drop me an e-mail or send me a letter. I’ll be back in touch soon.

The resulting reaction from Stoeffler was to cut Coulter. It seemed that they’d simply had enough of her style, or lack of it:

More words. More letters. No more Ann Coulter.

Finally, we’ve decided that syndicated columnist Ann Coulter has worn out her welcome

That last quote comes toward the end of his piece but I wouldn’t be surpised if his intention was to write ‘finally’ but imply ‘Thank God She’s Gone! Wipeeee!!’.

From Editor & Publisher: Arizona Daily Star’s Editor and Publisher David Stoeffler revealed that the paper was dropping Coulter’s syndicated column. One recent example of Coulter’s controversial approach was in her Aug. 10 column. She wrote: “(T)he savages have declared war, and it’s far preferable to fight them in the streets of Baghdad than in the streets of New York — where the residents would immediately surrender.”

“Many readers find her shrill, bombastic, and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives,” the recently appointed Stoeffler wrote.

E&P: ‘Arizona Daily Star’ Drops Ann Coulter’s ‘Shrill’ Column

Continue reading

Popularity: 1% [?]

Stuff On My Cat.com gets a reaction

stuffonmycat.com

Stuffonmycat.com is a website that follows the PostSecret style of displaying home-produced images of mildly unusual everyday life. Stuff On My Cat relies on the ability of people to put commonplace objects on top of their feline domestic pets. Since cats are so lazy, most of the time they won’t do anything to get out of the way or object to a reasonable amount being placed on and around them. Cats are tolerant.
What’s most interesting is the reactions of readers to the photos displayed. Below is the photo entitled ‘Roxy the cat and Josh the baby are inseparable’. The photo itself is fun because the cat and baby are so at peace together, but what’s most interesting is the at times positive, at times insulting, behaviour of readers.


comments about stuffonmycat.com

Popularity: 15% [?]